The Roman town of Vienne - Gallia Lugdunensis 2

 A view from Mount Pipet above the Roman theatre and looking up the Rhone and across the river to Saint Romain-en-Gal

I stood on the platform at Gare Part Dieu waiting for my train. The announcement for the arrival of the train had been made and I patiently waited for it. The train was destined for Gare St Charles in Marseille, and stopping at Vienne en route. The announcement referred to platform "E", but in French, as everybody knows,  the letter "I" is pronounced "E". Consequently, as I was inquiring from the stationmaster about my train on platform "E", he retorted by pointing across a couple of platforms, gesticulating at a train as it glided easily out of the station on time. An hour or so later I was on my way south heading towards Vienne. That evening Corinne would say that I might have made the same mistake if it was announced as platform "G", because of course as everybody knows the letter "J" is pronounced as "G". She smiled and inquired if I had felt terribly stupid at the time. Not sensing any sympathy I also smiled and ignored the comment.

If I had little interest in Roman Archaeology and the Roman provinces of Gaul and Germania, I might never have heard of Vienne and possibly might not have expressed an interest in stopping there for a visit. Prior to the arrival of the Romans, Vienne was the capital city of the Allobroges tribe, one of the most powerful Gallic tribes controling territory that stretched from the Rhone valley to the Alps. While the Allobroges had some contact and relations with Rome prior to the Gallic Wars, their fate was inevitable once Julius Caesar showed up in Gaul with his legions. The settlement was elevated to the status of a Colonia and despite the turbulent political chicanery of the late Roman Republic Colonia Julia Vienna flourished, in tandem with its neighbour Lugdunum [Lyon]. 

Both Lugdunum and Vienna thrived enjoying all the favour and infrastructure that one would associate with prominent Roman cities. They both had an Odeon and Theatre built, and both cities had a circus for chariot racing, a true barometer of a high level of romanisation. Most people associate the amphitheatre and circus buildings with Roman urban infrastructure. However, the circus was in fact quite rare and typically associated with provincial capitals. Four were built in Gaul; Lugdunum [Lyon], Vienna [Vienne], Arelate {Arles] and Santos [Saintes].  The structures of most of these circuses are no longer visible; the circus in Vienne was excavated during the 19th Century and early 20th Century and little of it remains visible today. However, in Vienne one of the obelisks from the spina still remains in its original position.  The date for the Circus is not definite but it may have been developed at a similar time to the one at Lugdunum, which we know from inscription evidence was developed or extended during the 2nd Century A.D.

 

Obelisk, known locally as La Pyramide, from the Roman circus at Vienne

The future of another Roman circus is currently lying in the balance, a little further north of Gaul, at Colchester in England. Known to the Romans as Camulodunum, this site was a provincial capital and while its prominence may have waned with the passage of time, it is obvious that the settlement enjoyed considerable status in the Roman Britain, and the citizens of Camulodunum appear to have had a keen interest in chariot racing. The circus was discovered in 2004 and may be consigned to history in the near future. I would respectfully suggest that replacing a Roman circus with a modern residential development is an act of vandalism and a desperate error in judgment.

View looking north across the cavea of the theatre, Vienne

 

The theatre in Vienne commands dramatic views over the town, and indeed up and down the Rhone river valley. The archaeological finds from the vicinity of the theatre suggest it was constructed in the mid 1st Century A.D. Constructed against the end of the colline Pipet with small valleys or cuts on either side, the site proved to be the perfect location for a large theatre facilitating the construction larges structures on either side for the management of the spectators access and egress. The diameter of the theatre is 129.8 meters, and it is estimated it could have seated 11,000 spectators. In form, the theatre at Vienne was quite similar to the one at Orange; it originally had a large scaenae frons structure estimated to have been 32 meters in height. The scaenae frons would have been roofed and was terminated at either end by a large basilica block. The orchestra measured 19 meters from which the vast cavea rose quite steeply to a height of 28.5 meters. Underneath the cavea there are the two hemispherical barrel vaulted passages or vomitoria facilitating the easy movemnt of  the spectators. Neither the extremities of these passages nor the cavea and seating above them have been restored.

View looking south across the cavea of the theatre, Vienne

I arrived mid morning and the sun had still not brought about a rise in the air temperature. The orchestra and cavea of the theatre were coated in an undisturbed perfect white covering of snow. It was surprising the theatre was open, but I managed to clamber around eager to experiece the great prospects across the theatre from either end of the summa cavea.  Underfoot the cavea was lethal; as I walked across the modern flat stage below I had slipped several times and 28 meters above the orchestra I took the greatest of care moving around.

During the 18th Century the structure was believed to be the vestiges of a Roman amphitheatre. This long held belief was born out by the street name in the area, because the street that runs along the front of the theatre is called Rue du Cirque. The restoration began on the cavea when a number of properties were purchased allowing for the clearance, excavation and restoration of the site. The theatre finally opened in 1938 and today just over 2/3 of the cavea is available for seating.

 View looking down on the cavea and orchestra from the top of the hill behind the theatre

Prior to this excursion in Lyon, while lunching with my new found friends at Les Adrets on Rue du Boeuf, I was advised to take the time to have lunch at Vienne. After visiting the theatre, and climbing up to the top of colline Pipet behind the theatre, a hunger had set in. I made my way back down through the town and towards 34 Cours du Verdun and to a restaurant called Les Saveurs du Marche, which I was reliably informed was one of the best places to eat in Vienne. I was not disappointed and enjoyed a simple well prepared and presented formule du midi, accompanied by the habitual pot of Cote du Rhone. 

The portico of temple of the divine Augustus and Livia, Place Charles de Gaulle, Vienne

Time was running out and there was still a lot to see in Vienne. The modern town of Vienne has not developed greatly in the last 2000 years. Newer buildings have clearly employed the stones of their predecessors and in no place is this more evident than Place Charles de Gaulle. One of the most interesting Roman monuments in Vienne is the Temple of the divine Augustus and Livia. The temple benefited from the attentions of Prosper Merimee, who was responsible for it being classified as a national monument, along with other sites in Vienne, in 1840.  On the 24th July 1835 Merimee published his "Notes d'un voyage dans le midi de la France". He visited Vienne on his tour of France in his capacity as Inspector of National Monuments and made the following comments on the condition of this temple:
"My first place to visit was the museum, presently established in a little antique temple, which was in the past converted to a church and horribly disfigured. The columns which surrounded the cella were now engaged in an ugly masonry, and if this was not enough of a barbarity, they have also chipped away the fluting of the columns, for the purpose of aligning them with the enclosing wall."

Significantly the temple in Vienne is one of two Roman temples left in tact in France, the other being the Maison Carree at Nimes. The masonry walls have now been taken away and the columns, some of which have been ravaged by time and the masons chisel, continue to support the architrave and entablature and pediment of the temple. Place Charles de Gaulle is today raised above the antique levels and an incline rises slightly towards the west side, and despite being set on a lower level of the square the temple surrounded by its barrier, stands with great stature and importance surrounded by more recent featureless and irregular constructions.  

 

A broken colossal head neatly placed on an upturned capital, Musee Archeologique Eglise St-Pierre

Much of the collection of stones, cut masonry, and statuary that would have been found in the Museum at Vienne visited by Merimee in the 1830s must now be in the Musee Archeologique Eglise St Pierre. This building is one of the oldest Churches in France dating back to the 5th and 6th Century and was most likely built on Roman foundations. Wandering around the large blocks which carry the marks of some distant important message, one finds broken colossal heads and elsewhere sandaled feet. I recently saw pictures of similar pieces being hauled out of the ground in Turkey at Sagalossos, and thereafter at the British Museum where some of the same items were displayed in the exhibition on Hadrian. In Vienne today these giant sculptures are hidden in a dimly lighted church dating to the 5th century, underneath which are to be found the foundations of ancient walls, streets, sewers and graves of a prolific Roman town.
 

A marble statue of Tutela, a Gallo-Roman goddess associated with Vienne

More recent discoveries found in excavations are exhibited in this museum, of which the statue of Tutela is the most striking. It stands out as being one of the more better preserved objects in the collection and was found during the excavation of the baths or thermes in 1954. Among the mosaics to be seen in this collection is the mosaic of the masks which is attributed to mosaic workers of the third Century A.D.. There are a vast array of objects to be found in this collection which are the soul surviving components of structures from the Roman town, and many of these items only exist today through the efforts of Pierre Schneyder who collected, recorded and investigated the vestiges of Roman structures during the latter half of the 18th Century. 

 Detail of mosaic of the masks at Musee Archeologique Eglise St-Pierre

Across the river Rhone is the smaller modern town of St Romain-en-Gal, which was an affluent residential and commerical area of the Roman town of Vienna. Discoveries of mosaics and other artifacts have been occurring in this area for over two hundred years, many being lost forever due to the weather, once exposed, or the use of the land. The area was well preserved because in the years subsequent to the Roman occupation, it was used primarily as an orchard, and not developed. However, as it was about to be built upon in the late 1960s, further discoveries were made and since 1981 a team of archeologists have been on site. In 1985 the site was classified as an historic monument and a museum now stands above a portion of the 7 hectare site housing many of the mosaics and finds from the excavations.

 

Central panel from an Orpheus mosaic, Musee Gollo Romain Saint Romain-en-Gal 

Mosaic from Musee Gollo Romain Saint Romain-en-Gal 

The Musee Gallo Romain Saint Romain-en-Gal, exhibits a magnificent amount of material found in the excavations. They reveal details of everyday life of the people that lived in Roman Vienna, and in particular the surroundings associated with the wealthy residential dwellings they occupied. Consequently, it is an important insight into the cultural identity of an important economic and commercial urban centre in Gaul. Many of the mosaics are well preserved however the two Orpheus mosaics found survive in fragmentary form. Portions of colourful frescoes that adorned the walls have also been excavated and preserved; one does not have to be too imaginative to envisage examples of the better preserved decoration from the walls in Pompeii and Boscoreale existing in Vienne.

It is surprising how much is visible of Roman Vienna and indeed the extent of the areas which are still to be investigated and excavated. As I have suggested, the Roman remains rest just below the surface or form part of the fabric of the Modern town of Vienne. A number of sites are undeveloped and await attention. One such structure is the Odeon which was built into the hillside of Saint-Juste. It is important because very few Roman towns were provided with a theatre and an Odeon; in particular only Lyon and Vienne had an Odeon and theatre complexes in Gaul. The Odeon in Lugdunum [Lyon] is quite well restored, however the Odeon in Vienne remains closed to the public. One can view the Odeon from further up the hillside of Saint-Just and look down upon the cavea structure without the seating, which would have been similar to the condition Prosper Merimee would have seen the theatre in the early 19th Century.

 A view through a locked gate of the Odeon at Vienne

The cavea of the Vienne Odeon structure measured 72 meters in diameter and had an orchestra which measured 22.3 meters in diameter. The Odeon at Lyon measured 73 meters in diameter and hence one cannot resist making comparisons between these structures. There was an impressive outer hemispherical wall pierced by three doorways, in much the same way as the Odeon built in Lyon. At Vienne the pulpitum, pro scaenum and portions of the scaenae frons area are still visible depite the covering of snow, when I saw this overgrown and dilapidated parcel of ground. The construction of the Odeon at Vienne probably dates to the second century A.D. and would have been a well decorated structure with statuary, and marble veneers from across the Roman Empire.

My visit to Vienne was brief, but I did managed to get a good understanding of the Roman town that existed there. In fact, I was left with an impression that Rome and its culture was not as distant as it could have been; the veins of the citizens of Vienna clearly ran with loyal Roman blood, and that there was a strong connection with not only Rome, but the Empire itself. In particular, what struck me was the wealth of material found at Vienne and in contrast the lack of material to be found in Orange, which would have been in the heart of Gallia Narbonnensis. This may be due to a lack of opportunities to investigate and excavate the lands surrounding Orange, but I did form the opinion from leafing through the field archeology magazines on the news stand waiting for my train, that discoveries of Roman villas and sites continued and that a great deal of Roman archeology remained hidden just below the surface of many French villages and towns.

An evening view looking south down the Rhone river valley from Vienne

A day trip to Orange and the Roman theatre

Roman theatre at Orange, view of the scaenae frons

Originally in planning our trip to Lyon I thought we might base ourselves in Orange for a night or two and travel to Arles and Nimes. Upon reflection this itinerary would have proved to be impossible and require us to rush form place to place. Ultimately we would not have had enough time to enjoy Lyon. Consequently we confined ourselves to a day trip to Orange. Corinne fanatasized about an increase in the temperature, however despite the bright sunshine this never materialised. Our route south during the morning bore witness the gradual build of the increasingly chilly wind which followed our route down the valley of the Rhone. Thoughts of peeling off a few layers of warm clothing disappeared and she put on an extra fleece to retain some warmth in the cold air.

 

 A view of the Roman theatre in Orange by Hippolyte Destailleur (1822 - 1893)

The Romans settled in the area were veterans of the second Gallic Legion. This settlement is reputed to have taken place occurred in or about 35 B.C. close to the site of a Gallic hill fort, home to the Tricastini tribe. The site was named Colonia Julia Secundanorum Arausio. Today one can view the well preserved  monuments built by these Roman settlers; the theatre and triumphal arch. Arausio became an administrative centre for the region of modern day northern Provence, a few kilometers from the river Rhone, and enjoyed a certain amount of stability until it was sacked by the Visigoths in 412 A.D. As such you would expect to find more evidence of Roman life in the local museum but its collection is quite limited and confined to finds associated with the theatre. This having been said the significance of the Roman architecture in the town has been recognised, and the site was listed by UNESCO in 1981.

Roman theatre at Orange, view of the cavea looking north west

Roman theatre at Orange, view of the passage access to the upper media cavea 

The theatre was built during the reign of Augustus [31 B.C. - 14 A.D.] and similar to many Roman theatres in Gaul the theatre in Orange utilises the steep rocky hillside of Saint-Eutrope to support the middle of the cavea. The theatre ranks as a medium size theatre in Roman Gaul measuring 103 meters in diameter. One can only begin to imagine and marvel at the massive scale of the structure that was built at Autun (Augustodunum) which measured approximately 148 meters in diameter.  The theatre was restored and embellished during the Hadrianic period [117 A.D. - 138 A.D.]. Either side of the theatre an arcaded perimeter wall contains stairwells providing access to barrel vaulted tunnels and the summa and media cavea. Similar to many Roman theatres, to the west of the theatre at Orange a large temple complex was constrcted into a hemicycle, again dictated by the hillside of Saint-Eutrope.

The theatre is most notable for the fact that the scaenae frons is still standing. the guide states that it is the only one in Europe still standing and draws comparison to the other scaenae frons structures still visible today at Aspendos in Turkey. Viewed from the street this wall is on a monumental scale standing 37 meters tall. The street side of the wall still has the series of corbels used to support masts from which a vela or cover was suspended over the theatre. Today all that remains on the surface treatment of the wall are some imitation arches in low relief. The wall facing the cavea would have been richly decorated with architectural ornament including columns, statuary and possibly mosaic on a number of levels.

 

Roman theatre at Orange, view of the cavea and scaenae frons from the hill of Saint-Eutrope

The scaenae frons was vitally important to the function and acoustics of the theatre. Vitruvius, who would have been alive for a portion of the reign of Augustus, set out in his ten book treatise, De Architectura, the importance and attributes of the scaena frons and its role in acoustics. The fifth Book deals with the Theatre and its construction and he makes the following comments:
"The roof of the colonnade to be built at the top of the rows of seats, should lie level with the top of the scaena, for the reason that the voice will then rise with equal power until it reaches the highest rows of seats and the roof. If the roof is not so high, in proportion as it is lower, it will check the voice at the point which the sound first reaches."
More recently studies have sought to examine and understand the acoustic effects of the Roman theatre and come to the conclusion that they worked very effectively; for reasons that would embarrass modern concert hall designers who would appear to depend on sound systems to control acoustics.

Roman theatre at Orange, view from Rue de la Republique of the scaenae frons wall

The structure was most likely abandoned as a theatre by the end of the 4th Century and was occupied for other purposes until the 19th Century. The precincts of the theatre were known to have been used as a prison, a fort, and occupied by the town's townspeople until the restoration commenced. By 1869 a series of annual shows were initiated; held during the Summer they were called "Fetes Romaines".

Contemporary drawings depict the theatre in a variety of conditions but an engraving from Gazette des Beaux-Arts published in 1861 depicts the cavea without seating and the arcing contours of the hillside which opens in places revealing the substructure of the cavea and the vaulted passages. The restoration of the theatre was begun in 1825 under the instructions of Prosper Merimee, Directer of Historic Monuments. The initial challenge, like similar ancient structures in the south of France, was to demolish the dwellings incorporated into and adjacent to the theatre. These works continued for many years and were overseen directly by Simon-Claude Constant-Defeux from 1856 to 1858. Later excavations were undertaken by the architect and archaeologist, Jules Formige, who also worked on the theatre at Arles and amphitheatres at Frejus and Lutece, in Paris. In the early 20th Century and is credited with discovering numerous articles now associated with the scaenae frons structure.

Theatre at Orange from Gazette des Beaux-Arts, Volume 11, 1861

Upon arrival at the site, I climbed up to the top of Saint-Eutrope to get a better vantage point when the sun was going to be at its highest point during the day. The sun's low flight across the early February sky meant that the hill of Saint-Eutrope placed most of the cavea in a cool shade. In contrast the immense scaena frons was exposed to bright sunshine and the white marble statue, said to be that of Augustus, was radiant in its niche. Afterwards we explored the theatre itself which it is estimated could seat up to 7,300 spectators. Wandering around the structure today you can experience the scale and atmosphere of one of the best preserved a Roman theatres. Viewing the theatre from Saint-Eutrope is a vertigo inducing experience but is in my opinion the only way to get a good look at the entirety of the theatre and put in a context of the surrounding countryside.

 The triumphal arch at Orange, view from the south

About half a kilometer to the north of the theatre can be found the Roman triumphal arch. The construction date of the triumphal arch at Orange is not easy to pin down because of the inscription evidence. If one is to interpret the inscription evidence associated with the arch it is easy to form the view that the construction was a prolonged process probably beginning under the reign of Augustus [31 B.C. - 14 A.D.] to honour the veterans of the Gallic Wars settled in the area, and later either embellished or remodeled under the reign of Tiberius [14 A.D. - 37A.D.] to commemorate the victories of Germanicus [16 B.C.? - 19 A.D.] in the Rhineland and of course Tiberius himself. This arch is important for a number of reasons; the arch is a provincial precursor to the more famous monumental triumphal arches of Septimius Severus [193 A.D. - 211 A.D.] and Constantine [306 A.D. - 337 A.D.] in Rome, having the principal arch in the centre and a minor arch to either side, and a sequence of four Corinthinan columns ranging across the facade. The decoration and inscriptions are well recorded, thanks to the restoration work, but despite the two thousand years which have passed since its construction much of the architectural ornament and sculptural reliefs, which are cut in limestone, are in reasonably good condition.

Impression of the Arch at Orange prior to restoration in 1825 from Gazette des Beaux-Arts,

Volume 11, 1861

 The triumphal arch at Orange, view from the north

The arch itself measures 19.57 meters long, 8.4 meters wide and 19.21 meters tall. The sculptural decoration that would have been placed on the attic story no longer exists but would have raised the overall height considerably. The arch was restored during the 1820s by the architect Augustin Caristie and another person called Renaux, who are also associated with the works being carried out the theatre at this time. The arch had been incorporated into the medeval walls of Orange and the first task was to liberate and isolate the structure.

 The triumphal arch at Orange, detail of relief above the right hand arch on the south side

Caristie is accredited with a very judicious and sympathetic restoration. The careful manner in which he undertook this task has made it possible for us to enjoy this important Roman piece of urban imperial and historical architecture. 

Many of the reliefs on the north and south sides depict typical trophy displays of shields, above them are motifs related to marine warfare such as tridents and anchors. The naval references in the arch may be a direct reference to the victory of Augustus at Actium in 31 B.C. The majority of these reliefs are in low relief, however the trophy scenes on the short sides were sculpted in high relief. These six panels, two destroyed on the west side, depicted the battledress, helmets, standards and trumpets and captives.

 The triumphal arch at Orange, view from the north and reconstructed west side

The battle relief on the attic story of the north side remains in good condition. Originally there may have been other bronze objects applied to the relief to add detail and embellishment but these have disappeared. The scene depicts a chaotic combat scene with the naked Gaulish tribesmen being killed and overpowered by the Roman Legionaries. The Roman Second Legion has been identified on a panel by the use of the Capricorn motif on the shield of an officer. The settlers and their descendants must have had certain amount of pride in the arch and what it commemorated; the victory over the Gaulish tribes was not to be forgotten and the arch guaranteed this.

 The triumphal arch at Orange, detail of a battle relief from the attic story

Returning to Lyon, I set my heart on exploring Vienne for a day and Corinne's thoughts leaned in the direction of shopping and staying in Lyon. I was amazed by the theatre and triumphal arch at Orange, but I admit I was overwhelmed by the the Roman building program at Vienne, and hope to relate my experience of some of them in the next entry.

A short trip to Lyon - Gallia Lugdunensis 1

A view across the Rhone towards Notre Dame de Fourviere

It was 20 years since I had been to Lyon and back then I did not stop for too long before moving on to my ultimate destination to the southeast of Lyon. For this trip, at the end of January, I decided to read up on Lyon to identify a few sights I would like to visit and add to my basic knowledge of the city, and its culture. I decided to refer to Elizabeth David's book on Provincial French Cooking, but I was surprised at her comments. She was of the opinion that one must be a Lyonnais to properly appreciate the local cooking and then proceeded to moan in an unappreciative manner about the anti climax that she experienced from the fountainhead of French cuisine. I suppose I should not be surprised to read this from somebody who ignored the Jura and Franche Comte in the same publication, but it still a good book despite these shortcomings. To assist me on my journey, I decided to travel with three books The cuisine of the Rose by Mireille Johnston, The White Cities by Joseph Roth, and Roman Gaul and Germany by Anthony King.

 

Lyon is not a monumental and decadent city in the mould of Paris. This ancient city has grown up and expanded at the confluence of two of France's most important waterways; the Rhone and the Saone. The Roman colony of Lugdunum was founded in 43 B.C by Lucius Munatius Plancus, a leading officer serving under Julius Caesar during his campaigns and battles to subdue the Gallic tribes. The site chosen by this officer, who is also reputed to have founded Augusta Raurica in 44 B.C. not far from Basel, was previously a Gallic hill fort occupied by the Segusiani, and today this vantage point towers over Lyon and is known as the Fourviere hill. Its significant position on the Rhone and Saone lended this site to being used as an administrative centre with easy and speedy access north and south on the navigable river systems which passed through the city. Over the next three hundred years this settlement would be favoured by a number of Emperors and Lugdunum flourished as a result. Features of this development still visible today are the numerous aqueducts, theatre, odeon and the amphitheatre.

A view looking south across the Roman theatre, Fourviere, Lyon

The steep featured flanks of the Fourviere descend to the Rhone and a number of bridges and passerelles make communication with Presqu'ile quite easy. As the name suggests, Presqu'ile is not quite an island but a strip of land that has been cut and narrows to a point where it finally reaches the confluence of the Rhone and Saone.

Roman Gaul is proving to be a tourist attraction for the modern town of Lyon and the Roman theatre on the Fourviere hill is the most visible representation of this period of the city's history. When the Roman builders arrived on site in or about 15 B.C. to build the first theatre structure in Gaul, they must have welcomed the prospect of building a theatre structure on this site because the steep hillsides in the vicinity could be easily employed in the construction of a theatre. While the slopes would minimise the need for a freestanding outer wall and a complicated series of vaults, arches and supports there are visible remains of radial substructures supporting the cavea. The theatre measures 108 meters in diameter which makes it a little larger than those built at Arles (Arelate) and Orange (Arausio). The remains of three cavea are visible, the media cavea and summa cavea are only to be identified by the series of vaults and hemispherical wall structures that would have supported them, and the remains of the ruined vomitoria quite immense. The date of the initial construction of this theatre places it firmly within the reign of the Emperor Augustus and there is evidence to suggest it was restored and extended during the reign of Hadrian, and it is suggested the scaena frons was added during this period.

A view looking west towards the cavea of the Roman theatre, Fourviere, Lyon

Although it faces east and overlooks most of the city of Lyon today, the scaena frons structure situated in front of the seating would originally have been approximately 30 meters high, and thus the great panoramic view to be seen today over Lyon would have been not a particular feature of this theatre. The structure would have been ornately decorated and some elegantly carved column bases are to be found on site today.  The hillside has a number of other interesting structures, and just to the south can be found the Roman odeon which is thought to have been constructed during the 2nd Century A.D. This is 73 meters in diameter and also backs onto the hillside for support and its cavea are surrounded by an immense boundary or outer wall, which is quite distinctive and sets it apart from its neighbour the theatre. The orchestra measures 21 meters in diameter and is decorated in opus sectile with porphyry and other exotic stones and marbles from the distant far flung corners of the Roman Empire.

A column base from the Roman theatre site

To the north of the theatre and also nestled into the hillside is the musee de la civilisation gallo-romaine the exhibition spaces of which are sunk into the hillside. It houses an important collection of sarcophagi, inscriptions, decorative mosaics and other materials found in excavations from the area. The mosaic of the circus race is quite well preserved and evidence of the fact that one of the four circus tracks to be found in the Gallic provinces was located not too far from the Fourviere hill, and in close proximity to the Gier Aqueduct. The aqueduct may have been the source of the water used in the fountains along the spina depicted in the mosaic.

Detail of the Circus Mosaic, Musee de la Civilisation Gallo-Romaine, Lyon

The remains of the amphitheatre are to be found to the north west of Place des Terreaux. Leaving this grand square, travelling north, and proceeding towards the district of La Croix Rousse, it was not long before I was walking up a steep hill into which the amphitheatre was built in circa 19 A.D. This is another example of the Roman engineers and builders exploitation of the terrain to construct and support their structures.

 The remains of the amphitheatre, La Croix Rousse, Lyon

The amphitheatre was excavated and investigated in circa 1818, and the quartier was developed thereafter. The remains, which are now incorporated into a garden, are presently covered by roads, modern buildings and indeed cut in half by a tunnel built to alleviate the flow of traffic leading up to La Croix Rousse. The size of the amphitheatre is debatable but is clear that it was improved and extended through the centuries and must have been an impressive sight. Some commentators are of the opinion the structure was smaller than those at Arles and Nimes. However my impression is that, in its most developed state the amphitheatre in Lugdunum would have been as significant as the amphitheatres built at Arles and Nimes. The principal difference in Lugdunum, is that the amphitheatre was both reliant upon and contained by terrain it was built into.

An important inscription was found in 1957 yielded evidence for not only the build date but the people who financed its construction; the inscription pays testament and records the fact that a Gallo-Roman family from Saintes (Santons), most likely seeking to underline its loyalty to Rome and the Emperor, constructed the amphitheatre at their own expense. It must be noted that there is also a magnificent amphitheatre to be found not far form the centre of Saintes.
 

 An aerial view of the amphitheatre using Google Earth

Having left Corinne at the ugly Gare SNCF Perrache, (she was going home for the day), I struck out for La Croix Rousse on foot. After viewing the amphitheatre, I descended through the town peering in through the windows of various boulangeries as I went. This city has a number of sweets and delicacies which were invented here, and can only be found elsewhere in specialist shops. The lush red pralines, crystalline crusty coated almonds, appear in most windows in one guise or another; dotted in various types of sweetened bread or tart pralinee or sables pralinees. The choclatier Voisin has a number of stores around the city, and they are responsible for the famous coussin de Lyon; a sugared elegant green marzipan filled with rich chocolate grenache in the shape of a cushion.

I crossed the city towards Fourviere and climbed the steep hill, absolutely breathless and weak by the time I found the theatre in bright winter sunshine. The day was bitterly cold and nobody was there. After spending half an hour wandering around looking for the remains of the aqueducts, and various mausoleums, I was quite conscious of the fact that the bells had stopped chiming in the nearby churches, and lunch would be now available. Wandering back through the streets of St Just towards Vieux Lyon, I eventually arrived at the point where I had commenced my ascent of the Fourviere hill at the top of Rue du Boeuf.

The path of least resistance led me down the narrow cobbled street to a restaurant on Rue du Boeuf called Les Adrets. Being both hungry and thirsty, I entered a long narrow dining room paved with tiles with strained and heavily deflected ,wooden beams overhead. It was full but a space at a table was found and I ordered terrine de gibier to be followed by tete de veau along with a refreshing pot of cote du rhone. Despite being obviously foreign, my choises engendered me to those sitting beside me, and they inquired about my little adventure and what I places I had visited and offered advice on what I should see next.

In the restaurants of Lyon you frequently end up wondering if there is anything that you would like to eat on the menu. You need to be adventurous. The menus can be viewed with some intrepidation if you are anxious about ordering various types of tripe, offal or combinations of both. My tete de veau probably shortened my life by two weeks, but it was unctuous and bitter and satisfying; the mellow sweet flavour of the gelatinous fat was cut by a parsley vinaigrette dressing. This dish would be relished and devoured, without a second thought, by a boatman who had been working his vessel up the Rhone, from perhaps Valence, for the previous 20 hours, against a strong current and a bitterly cold mistral wind. Arriving at the quays in Lyon, with his hands paralysed by the cold wind, this dish would have revived such a man. My meal was finished with a fantastically rich quenelle of chocolate mousse and a coffee, and the knowledge that I would be sentenced to at least three months hard labour for eating everything that put in front of me on this trip.

Opus reticulatum and opus mixtum still visible on a support of the Gier Aqueduct, Lyon

As Lugdunum thrived in the 1st Century A.D. the requirement to augment the water supply became a necessity and it was decided that four aqueducts would be built to attend to this need. The longest of the aquaeducts is 86 kilometres in lenght using the river Gier as its source. Evidence from inscriptions and archaeology has not been of great assistance in the dating of this aqueduct. Some archaeology suggests it could have been constructed during the reign of Augustus but it is more likely that it was operational under the reign of Claudius. Inscriptions found at Chagnon and St Joseph date to the reign of Hadrian and introduce a ban on ploughing and sewing in the vicinity of the aqueduct.

I have already refered tothe lenghty pondering I experienced reading a number of Lyonnais restaurant menus, and my chosen reading prior to the trip had not fully prepared me for this very distinctive cuisine. The books probably were too heavily influenced by Dijon and the Bourgogne and neglected the indigenous fare of the Lyonnais. Over the five days of thisparticular visit I have discovered the Bouchon, which is a type of Lyonnais restaurant serving earthy, homely food, but typically Lyonnais using just about every edible part of a pig, cow, chicken or available fish; lentils, onions and macaroni are a feature of the Lyonnais cuisine.

The first Bouchon we dined in was La Meuniere. It was one the most enjoyable meals I have ever had. Most of the prepared food was laid out on a bench in the middle of the very dated and somehow complimentary dining room. It appeared not to have been decorated since the 50s or 60s and was somewhat spartan in appearance, however posters celebrating Beaujolais wine served as a strong suggestion as to what you should be ordering with your meal. The staff engaged with you in a very familiar way, and some diners received a reproach for failing to clear their plates. While I had a terrine to start, I decided to have poulet fermier a la vinaigre for my main course. I did not expect this dish to be as agreeable as it was. It was very good. Thereafter, I received slap on the hand when I thought the canut, a soft cream cheese with herbs and garlic, was my cheese course of preference. Instead I was directed to two large wooden boards full of locally produced cheeses.

The next Bouchon, was the similarly celebrated Le Garet. The menu of the day was noteworthy because it sums up for me what Lyonnais cuisine is all about; Salade de dent lion aux oreilles de cochon (a salad of dandilions with pigs ears); Omlette a la truffe Francaise; Ris de veau a la creme et champignons. I began my meal with an offering of five bowls from the kitchen containing, Lentil salad, mousseau (pickled face of cow thinly sliced), pied de veau, saucisson de veau et cochon, and tripe; collectively known as salad de cochonailles. A pot of Crozes Hermitage worked very well with this selection and the following plate of le tablier du sapeur, which was a section of marinated and fried tripe. The dessert was a homemade blackcurrant ice cream, barely sweetened, which was served with a bottle of vieux marc to use as you pleased, and I did!

 Some of the creations of the Patissier and choclatier Richard Seve

Food forms a very important part of Lyonnais living and they are proud of their traditional servings and just as proud of their influences on the new modern cuisine developing in France today. It is not based upon fusion or any passing weakness for a modish taste but merely a celebration and presentation of French food and its industry at its very best. The master boulangers, patissiers and affineurs that base themselves in Les Halles Paul Bocuse are representative of this ideal. They are some the best boulangers and patissiers in France and strive to produce the best quality food to a very high standard. You rarely witness crowds of people surrounding a butcher stall focusing on a butcher dressing a rack of lamb but this occurs most days at les Halles Paul Bocuse.

Street markets are also a feature of Lyon life, as they are of most French villages, towns and cities. Local producers sell their fresh vegetables and fruit and anything else they think the pubic will purchase. I spotted one vendor selling walnuts, walnut spreads, and huile de noix; the oil produced from the pressing of the walnuts. They also sold the tourteaux de noix, which is the dried remains of the pressed walnuts. It can be used much in much the same way as chestnut flour to flavour flour in making biscuits or in general baking.

My personal preference leans towards the everyday and traditional food of the bouchon which preserves the old dishes in an unglamorous and less ostentatious way. This food is generally consumed with the three princes of Lyon; Beaujolais, Cotes du Rhone, or Crozes Hermitage and after a few days my fear and intrepidation has turned, with a little understanding, into a sense of surprise at every menu. This understanding will no doubt encourage me to return and continue my exploration of the Gallo Roman ruins.

The Roman amphitheatre at Beziers

A View of Beziers from the ramparts looking west

Two years ago I passed Beziers on the train en route from Marseilles to Bordeaux. As the train pulled out of Beziers I saw for the first time the town's walls, citadel and cathedral perched high on a hillside. While on a short break to Carcassonne, I suggested to Corinne that we might consider a short excursion to either Beziers, Narbonne or Toulouse, which were within easy reach. We settled on Beziers and Corinne had yet again chosen to stand by and look at me roaming around gazing at another pile of stones, followed by an enjoyable, amiable and lengthy lunch at Restaurant Cote Sud, 19 rue Viennet.

The Romans founded a colony on the site of the modern town of Beziers, naming it Julia Baeterrae Septimanorum, on or about 36 - 35 B.C. Given the strong strategic qualities of the topography of this hilltop site and the proximity of the river Orb at the foot of the hill of St Nazaire to the west, it is not difficult to argue with their choice. The Romans were not the first to chose this site as archaeological excavations have revealed evidence of habitation dating to the 6th Century B.C.

The views commanded from the ramparts today further underline the importance of the site; the town stands at a point where the valley is almost at its broadest providing uninterrupted views to the north, west and south, most importantly up the valley towards Narbonne and beyond. Julia Baeterrae Septimanorum was also chosen because of the fact it stood on the Via Domitia. This was an overland route constructed by the Romans in 118 B.C. initially linking Italy to the colonia Narbo Martius [Narbonne], but as time went on and expansion continued the route was extended into Spain.

Medieval buildings along Rue des Arenes the curve of which was dictated by the amphitheatre

I initially wanted to find the Roman amphitheatre which I understood to be south east of the cathedral of St Nazaire. Finding Rue des Arenes in the quiet residential Quartier of St-Jacques, where some of the streets in the area were clearly following an ellipse, I knew the amphitheatre could not have been too far away, but we could not catch a glimpse of any opening or space that would reveal the remains of the amphitheatre.

Detail from a street sign

Getting desperate we asked an old man where we might find the amphitheatre, and he pointed us in the opposite direction where we found locked steal gates preventing entry and a view of the site. I was initially disappointed but climbed the barrier to get a better view. My disappointment continued as I always thought there would be more obvious visible signs of the amphitheatre's remains. A clearance where a part of the central area of the original arena had originally been was now roughly preserved as a garden or park with a number of surrounding buildings backing onto it, and others built across an area to the south where the amphitheatre had been dismantled.

View of the amphitheatre site looking north

The amphitheater at this particular site was in no way similar to the amphitheatres I had seen at Arles and Nimes. The scale of the amphitheatre at Beziers was never going to rival those structures; the structure at Beziers is estimated to have measured approximately 108.3 metres by 88.6 metres and reported to be capable of seating 13,700 people. However, as I gazed at the site an impression of the amphitheatre was slowly being built in my mind as I pondered the levels of occupation, some built directly on top of the supporting arches of the amphitheatre. I gradually felt quite fortunate to be viewing an amphitheatre from another perspective i.e. beneath more recent levels of occupation which had their own merit. In the case of the amphitheatre at Arles over 200 buildings were cleared from the structure and the areas around the amphitheatre during the 1820s in an attempt to restore and preserve the amphitheatre. Thus today at Beziers you can get a real idea of how a Roman amphitheatre impacts on a modern street plan and development of a town following its demise.

View to the north-west showing the top edge of an area where spectators possibly the media cavea would have been seated and structures to support further seating below

The amphitheatre is reported to date to the third quarter of the 1st century A.D. placing it in the great period of amphitheatre building under the Flavian emperors. The topography of the hill of St-Jacques lends itself well to the building of an amphitheatre as the south and west sides are built into the hillside. The amphitheatre in situ was built with stone like many of the other Roman amphitheatres built at this time; there is no evidence of brick in the visible remains of the substructures, arches and supports of the amphitheatre at Beziers.

A sketch or impression of the amphitheatre at Beziers dating to circa 1627 has been discovered, and this gives us an idea of the dilapidated state of the structure during the early 17th Century. It clearly illustrates the fact that not all of the structure had been reduced as a section of the elliptical exterior wall remains [page 131 of the PDF]. The sketch appears to have been made from a vantage point or building close to the aptly named Place du Cirque to the North of the amphitheatre. Still visible today is an elliptical wall of the arena in the sketch which appears in the photograph below.

View of the amphitheatre remains looking south

The thought that I was exploring the Roman amphitheatre after it had become inhabited and absorbed by the swelling population of the town following the demise of the amphitheatre from the end of the 3rd century A.D. was becoming more attractive to me. However, the fact that I could only do this from a distance, and at that from selected perches on top of various fences was not so attractive.

The stonework taken from the amphitheatre at Beziers was said to be used in the construction of the town's walls. This may be correct as the Roman provinces of Gaul were gradually destabilised and plunged into turmoil. Beziers would not have escaped the notice of invading Visigoths and Franks and was devastated by being sacked on numerous occasions over the last 2000 years; the Albigensian Crusade in 1209 being one of the most infamous. One might have thought there would have been little or no evidence on this site to be found of the Roman occupation, and in particular decorative material. However, in April 1844 10 statuary busts dating to the Julio-Claudian period were discovered in a cellar of a house on what is now called Boulevard Paul Riquet. The busts are now in the Musee Saint-Raymond in Toulouse.

As the Cathedral of St Nazaire at Beziers rolled into my line of sight as I sat on the train two years ago, the view was quite alluring and clearly echoed an ancient past. In reality the town of Beziers is a little disappointing. The lack of a map at the gare SNCF signals a general lack of interest. I may be biased but the Mairie or town council does not go out of its way to make the amphitheatre a landmark or accessible, and this is most unfortunate for the town. A few viewing platforms in locations, possibly in places where I was forced to climb fences, with informative displays (vandal proof if required) would not interfere or have a negative impact on the ambiance of the residential area, or indeed turn it into a tourist trap. Beziers clearly needs a boost to rise above the dull mediocrity and in many places the filth. This could be a start!

Mandeure - Epomanduodorum Roman Theatre

View of the remains of the Roman Theatre at Mandeure from the West

As I have already related, the first city of the Sequanii was called Vesontio which is situated on the site of the modern city of Besancon. To the north east and further up the river Doubs can be found the second city of the Sequanii, known then as Epomanduodorum.

The site of Epomanduodorum is close to the modern city of Montbelliard, and located between the villages of Mandeure and Mathay, and is situated on the inside of a long sweeping meandering bend in the river Doubs. The Roman theatre can be found just outside Mandeure and has had a mixed history of discovery and rediscovery. The first recorded archaeological discovery at Mandeure, a hoard of coin, was in 1548. However, it was not until later in the 16th century that Frederic de Wurtenburg-Montbeliard ordered that excavations take place on the site. Excavations back then revealed the remains of many Roman buildings, carved stone and masonry, coloured marble and rare stones, and an inscription recording the a donation made by one Flavius Catullus for the decoration of the thermes in marble.

Views from the existing top ridge of the Theatre

Interest was revived in the site and the Roman theatre again in 1820 when the hillside, known locally as the "cirque" was investigated and excavations have taken place there on a sporadic basis over the last two hundred years. In 1889 fragments of colossal statues were unearthed on a scale similar to those discovered recently at Sagalossos in Turkey, and some of these fragments can be found at the Musee du Chateau des Ducs de Wurtenburg, Montbeliard.

The size of the Roman theatre, being a public building, would suggest that Epomanduodorum was a substantial town. While not a civitas as Vesontio was, Epamanduodorum thrived during the 2nd Century A.D. when this part of the Roman Empire was relatively settled. The site appears to have had some strategic or commercial significance for the Romans. Its position and proximity to the Doubs must be relevant. Indeed the Doubs river may have been an important trading route and means of transport giving easy access though the region.

What is certain, is the fact that the town was a noteworthy stop on a Roman route. The Tabula Peutingeriana records a town by the name of Epomanduo on a route running between Matricorum (Metz) and Augusta Rauricum (Kaiseraugst). One issue that arises when one considers the map is that the Doubs is not represented, while rivers and other waterways are referred to on the map. The schematic nature of the map, its scale, and the fact that it may be a combination or conglomerate of other original maps, may be taken into account when one considers the relative positioning of Epomanduo, other towns, and the omission of the river Doubs and other important topography.

The proximity of the Rhine would strongly suggest that the armies were based in these towns and lived in peace with and alongside the local population. The Roman settlements to be found between Vesontio and Augusta Ruaricum, known in French archaeological terms as the "arc juracienne", are notable for their romanisation with significant structures such as theatres and amphitheatres, which the armies were capable of building, possibly with a view to winning the "hearts and minds" of the Sequanii, Ruracii, and Helvetii tribes in return for their loyalty, but it is likely that they were also be used to entertain the armies while wintering in these locations. The remains of other Roman theatres have been found in the region at Augusta Ruracum and Aventicum [Avenches], and both measure approximately 120 meters in diameter.

The period of transition and romanisation began early after the initial conquests and one indication of this transition is marked by the romainisation of the name of the local chief of the Sequanii. Inscriptions on coins from the period of "TOGIRIX", in the 50s A.D., were gradually changed to "Q. IULIUS TOGIRIX". This romanisation and development did not take place to the exclusion of, or replace the indigenous cults and beliefs, because the remains of a substantial Gallic sanctuary and temple, which was constructed in the Gallo-roman period, is located 300 meters to the west of the theatre.

The Roman theatre at Epomanduodorum measures 142 meters across and in excess of 25 meters in height. It is estimated to have been capable of seating in excess of 20,000 people, far greater than Mandeure's population today, which is in the region of 5000 people. The dimensions available suggest that this was one of the largest theatres built in Roman Gaul. Only the Roman theatre at Augustodunum [Autun] is bigger at 148 meters. While the Roman theatre at Vienne (just south of Lyon) measures in the region of 130 meters across. (A partially excavated structure reported to be a theatre in Meaux is reported to be in the region of 150 metres in diameter).

Be cause of the variation in size of theatres that have been built throughout Gaul, one consideration which comes to mind is the possibility that the size of the theatre or amphitheatre in a particular town may be linked to the number of soldiers based there and not just simply dependent on the number of inhabitants normally living in that town. Obviously, a town's population would swell in winter months due to the fact that the armies were not likely to be on campaign and this would also effect the size of an audience at a theatre.

View from the south looking across the remains of the scaenae frons

View looking down towards the vomitoria on the south side of the theatre

Excavated and partially restored vomitoria on the north side of the theatre

Excavated wall which follows ridge line around the theatre

Part of an excavated outer wall set behind the ridge and the wall in the above photograph

Like many Roman theatres the example at Epomanduodorum was constructed using the natural sloping hillside to support the main body of the theatre or auditorium, and four layers of seating or cavea. Very few theatres were built freestanding, because these would have been very expensive and time consuming to construct. The surrounding walls of the theatre would have been articulated with four levels of arcading. At either end of the theatre there are the remains of structures which provided a means of access and egress to and form the cavea, and these were known as vomitoria. The upper level, would have originally run most of the way around the theater, was used as a walkway and would have had a roof.

Visiting the site today you cannot but be impressed by the scale of the theatre and the panoramic views from the top of the hill across the Franche-Comte countryside, and along the Doubs. There is little evidence of the town of Epomanduodorum across the fields and pasture that exist today, and it is easy to conceive how this structure became overgrown and was lost for just over a thousand years following the collapse of the Roman control in this area in the 4th century A.D.